##### Like what you saw?

##### Create FREE Account and:

- Watch all FREE content in 21 subjects(388 videos for 23 hours)
- FREE advice on how to get better grades at school from an expert
- Attend and watch FREE live webinar on useful topics

# Simplifying Determinants - Problem 2

###### Norm Prokup

###### Norm Prokup

**Cornell University**

PhD. in Mathematics

Norm was 4th at the 2004 USA Weightlifting Nationals! He still trains and competes occasionally, despite his busy schedule.

Let’s evaluate another determinant, now we want to use as many of our simplification steps as possible to make this easier. We have a pretty complicated looking determinant here. I think the first thing I’m going to do is try to get another zero in the top row, so that when I expand I’ve got a lot of zeros in that row.

What I’m going to do is, I’m going to multiply this first column by 4 and add the result to the third column. You can always take any column, multiply by a constant and add the result to another column. The same goes for rows. That step is not going to change the first two columns. I can just copy those down, 16 -9 30, 0 15 -20. But 4 times 16 is 64 plus -64 is 0. That’s my 0. 4 times -9 is -36 plus -12 is -48. 4 times 30 is 120 plus 10 is 130. I have my two zeros and expanding it across the top row is going to be a lot easier. But I still have a lot of common factors, in these rows that I can pull out.

Let me do that. I can actually pull a 16 out of the first row. That will leave 1, 0, 0. And this row, the second row looks like it’s got a factor of 3. So let me pull that out and that leaves -3 5 -16. Finally this bottom row has got a factor 10. So that’s going to be 3, -2 and 13. This is going to be much easier now.

What I have here on the left is just a bunch of constants. 48 times 10, 480, and then if I expand this determinant along the top row, I have 1 times this determinant. 1 times 5 -16, -2 13. And then I have minus zero times some other determinant, doesn’t even matter because it’s zero. Plus zero times another determinant, again doesn’t matter because you have a zero in front. So these are just going to disappear, these terms.

And then you’re left with 480 times, and this is going to be 65 minus 32. That’s going to be 33. 480 times 33, which ends up being 15840. And that’s our answer.

So you see when you’re dealing with a complicated looking determinant, you really should do as many simplification steps as you can before hand. It makes the process a lot easier.

Please enter your name.

Are you sure you want to delete this comment?

###### Norm Prokup

PhD. in Mathematics, University of Rhode Island

B.S. in Mechanical Engineering, Cornell University

He uses really creative examples for explaining tough concepts and illustrates them perfectly on the whiteboard. It's impossible to get lost during his lessons.

Thiswas EXCELLENT! I am a math teacher and have been looking for an easy/logical way to explain the lateral area of a cone to my students and this was incredibly helpful, thank you very much!”

I just learned more In 3 minutes of polygons here than I do in 3 weeks in my math class”

Hahaha, his examples are the same problems of my math HW!”

###### Get Peer Support on User Forum

Peer helping is a great way to learn. Join your peers to ask & answer questions and share ideas.

##### Concept (1)

##### Sample Problems (3)

Need help with a problem?

Watch expert teachers solve similar problems.

## Comments (0)

Please Sign in or Sign up to add your comment.

## ·

Delete