##### Like what you saw?

##### Create FREE Account and:

- Watch all FREE content in 21 subjects(388 videos for 23 hours)
- FREE advice on how to get better grades at school from an expert
- Attend and watch FREE live webinar on useful topics

# Indefinite Integrals - Problem 1

###### Norm Prokup

###### Norm Prokup

**Cornell University**

PhD. in Mathematics

Norm was 4th at the 2004 USA Weightlifting Nationals! He still trains and competes occasionally, despite his busy schedule.

One useful property of indefinite integrals is the constant multiple rule. This rule means that you can pull constants out of the integral, which can simplify the problem. For example, the integral of 2x + 4 is the same as the 2 multiplied by the integral of x + 2. However, it is important that only constants—not variables—are pulled out of the integral.

Another property is the power rule of antiderivatives (remember that to take the integral of something is to antidifferentiate). The power rule states that the antiderivative of a x^{n} is x^{n+1}/n + c, where c is some constant.

Let's solve some indefinite integrals. We're going to need two properties first. This property; the constant multiple rule.

If you're integrating the constant times some function, you can pull the constant out of the integrals, that's really helpful. We use that in these examples. The second is the power rule of anti-derivatives. When you're integrating x to the n, the anti-derivatives are 1 over n plus 1, x to the n plus 1 plus c. So we use both of those.

Let's take a look at this problem. It says perform the antidifferentiation. That's good because it reminds us that solving indefinite integrals means antidifferentiating; coming up with the antiderivatives of this function. Check by differentiating your answer. This is something students don't do enough of. You should always check your answer when you're not sure about what you come up with. So I want to try to get you in the habit by doing that myself.

So first of all, let's take the opportunity to use the constant multiple rule on this integral. 3 is a constant, so I can pull it out. That makes the integral look like this; x to the 4th dx. So this is 3 times the integral of x to the 4th dx. This integral can be solved using this formula. So n is 4, so I'm going to have 1 over 4 plus 1; 1 over 5. So it's 3 times 1 over 5 x to the 5, plus, let's call it c1.

Now I'm going to distribute the 3 over these terms. I get 3/5x to the 5th plus 3 times c1. Usually what you do in the end, is you just convert this to a new constant, and call it c. 3 times c1 is just an arbitrary constant, so you can just call it c. Think of it as renaming the constant. The renaming of 3 times c1, just c. So that's my set of antiderivatives. 3/5x to the 5th plus c.

Now I want to check by differentiating. So I'm going to differentiate this, and hopefully, I'll get this back again. So let me do that here. The derivative with respect to x of 3/5 x to the fifth plus c. So I get 3/5 time, and the derivative of x to the 5th is 5x to the fourth. The derivative of the plus c part is just 0. Now 3/5 times 5 is 3. So I get 3x to the 4th. That is the function I began with. So this is correct. That checks.

Let's take a look at another example. At the integral of 12 over x to the 5th. Now I want to rewrite this in a form that will allow me to use the power rule. When you have a power of x in the denominator, you can still use the power rule. This is the same as 12 times x to the -5 dx. The power rule will apply to this function.

First, I want to take the 12 out using the constant rule. So 12 times the integral of x to the -5 dx. The power rule says, that's it's going to be x to the -5. I always add 1. Maybe I should write this up. X to the -5 plus 1 over -5 plus 1, plus, I'll call it c1.

Now -5 plus 1 is -4. So this is 12 times x to the -4 over -14 plus c1. Then I can distribute the 12. So the 12 divided by -4 is going to give me -3x to the -4 plus 12c1. Then I can rename this just c. I could also write this as -3 over x to the 4th. So that's my set of antiderivatives; -3 over x to the 4th plus c.

Now I should check this by differentiation. I'm going to start with it in this form, since when I differentiate, I also use the power rule for derivatives. So the derivative of -3x to the -4 plus c is -3 times the derivative of x to the -4. That's -4x to the, remember the power rule is down by, so from -4 to -5. Then, the derivative of plus c, 0. -3 times -4 is 12. So I get 12x to the -5. Let's just check back. That is what I started with, 12x to the -5. So this is correct. That means that this is my correct answer. These are my antiderivatives of 12 over x to the 5th.

Please enter your name.

Are you sure you want to delete this comment?

###### Norm Prokup

PhD. in Mathematics, University of Rhode Island

B.S. in Mechanical Engineering, Cornell University

He uses really creative examples for explaining tough concepts and illustrates them perfectly on the whiteboard. It's impossible to get lost during his lessons.

Thiswas EXCELLENT! I am a math teacher and have been looking for an easy/logical way to explain the lateral area of a cone to my students and this was incredibly helpful, thank you very much!”

I just learned more In 3 minutes of polygons here than I do in 3 weeks in my math class”

Hahaha, his examples are the same problems of my math HW!”

###### Get Peer Support on User Forum

Peer helping is a great way to learn. Join your peers to ask & answer questions and share ideas.

##### Concept (1)

##### Sample Problems (3)

Need help with a problem?

Watch expert teachers solve similar problems.

## Comments (0)

Please Sign in or Sign up to add your comment.

## ·

Delete